Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 10:30:22 07/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2002 at 11:41:23, George Piles wrote: > > > I believe the Most vocal Critics has Been Silent, It is routine now for >Programs to Get GM Norms even on relatively Slow machines. One would have to be >a fool to say computers are Not GM Strength, since the evidence is Overwelming. >I think it could be said with confidence that the top programs running on 500mhz >and up are GM strength without doubt. I can't recall one "bad" result of the >Computers in the last three years playing Humans. For those who claim that >humans have only to get more experience against the programs and then the >program results will get worst, i have this too say, "when will this happen" so >far the computer results have Been consistent. Computers have won "far" more >games then they have lost over a four year period. (more then enough time for >humans to learn anti-computer methods}. The debate will not be over until the computers have completely overtaken. Given enough games, will the GM's start to learn anticomputer strategy? So far, most of them don't seem to care about it. I think that they play at the strength of GM's and they make brilliant moves like GM's. They achieve results similar to GM's. But I am not ready to concede equal ability until it is mathematically demonstrated.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.