Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is The Computer\Grandmaster Debate finally over??

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 10:42:38 07/31/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 31, 2002 at 11:41:23, George Piles wrote:

>It is routine now for
>Programs to Get GM Norms. One would have to be
>a fool to say computers are Not GM Strength, since the evidence is Overwelming.
>I think it could be said with confidence that the top programs running on 500mhz
>and up are GM strength without doubt. I can't recall one "bad" result of the
>Computers in the last three years playing Humans. For those who claim that
>humans have only to get more experience against the programs and then the
>program results will get worst, i have this too say, "when will this happen" so
>far the computer results have Been consistent. Computers have won "far" more
>games then they have lost over a four year period. (more then enough time for
>humans to learn anti-computer methods}.

The only stupid questions are the ones that you already know the answer to. It
appears you already know the answer to this one. I think you can draw figure out
the conclusion...

Russell



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.