Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Morovic-Ferret Postponed until September

Author: Bruce Moreland

Date: 08:28:38 08/10/98

Go up one level in this thread



On August 10, 1998 at 09:48:37, Fernando Villegas wrote:

>Morovic-Ferret Postponed until September
>I regret to communicate all of you that Ivan has just called me to say that it
>is impossible for him to play now as much as his problems with his home removal
>are not solved, so he is using all afternoons to look for a new flat and so has
>not the time neither the stamina to play now. He promised, nevertheless, to do
>it around middle September, after returning a tournament in Europe, but then he
>expect to play at most 4 games against ferret, not 6. He is very thankful to all
>that people that has offered even more money, although he insist that he would
>do it the same without a penny.
>I personally regret very much all this as much as I kindled some sparks of
>enthusiasm and expectations about, but  my effort to persuade Ivan to play
>anyway, no matter the problems,  was not enough and he refused sternly. I am
>sorry and in the very fringe to reach the same conclusion that so many people
>reach each time they try to organize something and then fail, the conclusion
>encased in that old saying about how better is not do endeavor nothing in order
>not to risk nothing.

This isn't working out, so I am cancelling, assuming that Morovic doesn't show
up on ICC tonight for game one of six.  I will have to be there anyway to
explain to everyone why there is no game.

I am willing to put my reputation on the line in a match with a very strong
player at traditional tournament time controls, with no corresponding blitz
match I can use to save face by wiping him out, and I am willing to be
accomodating and to give him every possible advantage.

But I can't have it be of indeterminate and shrinking length.

From "six games" to "at most four games" probably means one game, if I lose.
And if I lose a one-game match I will be for years the program that was too weak
for a GM to play twice.

This would be the worst possible outcome, and I think I am justified in avoiding
any chance that this will happen.

bruce



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.