Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is The Computer\Grandmaster Debate finally over??

Author: Jonas Cohonas

Date: 11:47:30 07/31/02

Go up one level in this thread


On July 31, 2002 at 11:56:42, Albert Silver wrote:

>On July 31, 2002 at 11:41:23, George Piles wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I believe the Most vocal Critics has Been Silent, It is routine now for
>>Programs to Get GM Norms even on relatively Slow machines. One would have to be
>>a fool to say computers are Not GM Strength, since the evidence is Overwelming.
>>I think it could be said with confidence that the top programs running on 500mhz
>>and up are GM strength without doubt. I can't recall one "bad" result of the
>>Computers in the last three years playing Humans. For those who claim that
>>humans have only to get more experience against the programs and then the
>>program results will get worst, i have this too say, "when will this happen" so
>>far the computer results have Been consistent. Computers have won "far" more
>>games then they have lost over a four year period. (more then enough time for
>>humans to learn anti-computer methods}.
>
>I think the best programs play at a GM-level, although there clearly are
>inconsistencies. As to learning anti-computer methods, all I can say is that
>although I know them, I have ZERO interest in working and perfecting on them.
>What for? Spend time learning how to consistently play differently than the way
>I do, in order to score some vacuous point against my computer? Forget it. I've
>got better things to do with my time, even if I were certain of success. When I
>play a machine, I play the same way I usually do, alhtough I am a little more
>careful perhaps. The whole point about playing a program (IMHO) is to have fun
>and possibly improve/practice my game. I won't do that if I do it differently.
>
>                                        Albert

I think that in the not so distant future we will see big money matches where
comp's face humans (or the other way around).
This might be a valid argument for studying anti-comp strategies (assuming i am
right), atleast for most GM's.

Regards
Jonas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.