Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:17:03 07/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2002 at 17:09:33, Nolan Denson wrote: >Hello Dan > >I ran this in Matrix and it's not seeing the 3... Ra8 so it don't like the Ra3 >that great. It seems to think Rab8 is best > > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 83:20 (83:20) > nss depth time score variation (1) > (2) 5-> 0.12 0.82 1. ... Ra2 2. Nc1 Rc2 3. cxb4 Bxb4 > 4. Kg1 > 6 0.25 0.78 1. ... Ra2 2. Nc1 Rc2 3. cxb4 Bxb4 > 4. Kg1 Ng4 > 6 0.47 0.77 1. ... Bc5 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ng3 Nh7 > 4. Bd2 Bc5 > 6 0.86 0.60 1. ... Rc6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Nc3 Qg4 > (3) 6-> 0.89 0.60 1. ... Rc6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Nc3 Qg4 > (2) 7 1.20 0.86 1. ... Rc6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Nc3 Qg4 5. Bxf6 Rxf6 6. Qxg4 hxg4 > 7. Rxf6 Nxf6 8. Nxe5 > 7 1.89 0.72 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Ng3 Bc5 5. Bh6 > 7-> 2.12 0.72 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Ng3 Bc5 5. Bh6 > 8 3.83 0.57 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ne3 Ra2 > 4. Nc1 Rb2 5. Kg1 Rd8 > 8-> 4.33 0.57 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ne3 Ra2 > 4. Nc1 Rb2 5. Kg1 Rd8 > 9 6.39 0.78 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ne3 Ra3 > 4. Nd5 Nxd5 5. exd5 Qf5 6. Qg3 Qg4 > (3) 9-> 13.48 0.78 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ne3 Ra3 > 4. Nd5 Nxd5 5. exd5 Qf5 6. Qg3 Qg4 > (2) 10 25.83 0.67 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Qg4 > 4. Nd3 Qxg5 5. Nxb4 Ra7 6. Nd5 Ra2 > 10-> 30.25 0.67 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Qg4 > 4. Nd3 Qxg5 5. Nxb4 Ra7 6. Nd5 Ra2 > 11 44.36 0.66 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Be7 > 4. Nd3 Ng4 5. Bxe7 Qxe7 6. Kg1 Rf6 > 7. Qg3 Kg8 > (2) 11-> 1:04 0.66 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Be7 > 4. Nd3 Ng4 5. Bxe7 Qxe7 6. Kg1 Rf6 > 7. Qg3 Kg8 > 12 1:29 0.69 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Be7 > 4. Nd3 Ng4 5. Bxe7 Qxe7 6. Qg3 Ndf6 > 7. Rfe1 Rd8 8. Kg1 > 12 6:16 0.60 1. ... Rab8 2. cxb4 Rxb4 3. Nc1 Rc7 > 4. Rd5 Qg4 5. Bxf6+ Bxf6 6. Qf2 Qh4 > 7. Qd2 Rbb7 8. Nd6 > 12-> 6:16 0.60 1. ... Rab8 2. cxb4 Rxb4 3. Nc1 Rc7 > 4. Rd5 Qg4 5. Bxf6+ Bxf6 6. Qf2 Qh4 > 7. Qd2 Rbb7 8. Nd6 > 13 11:37 0.52 1. ... Rab8 2. cxb4 Rxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Nc1 Rb5 5. Bh4 Rc6 6. Rdd1 Nc5 7. > Nd3 Rxb3 8. Ncxe5 > 13-> 12:42 0.52 1. ... Rab8 2. cxb4 Rxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Nc1 Rb5 5. Bh4 Rc6 6. Rdd1 Nc5 7. > Nd3 Rxb3 8. Ncxe5 > 14 27:07 0.62 1. ... Rab8 2. cxb4 Rxb4 3. Nc1 Rc7 > 4. Rd5 Rbb7 5. Bxf6+ Qxf6 6. Qd1 Qe6 > 7. Nd3 f6 8. Na5 Ra7 9. Qf3 > 14-> 35:13 0.62 1. ... Rab8 2. cxb4 Rxb4 3. Nc1 Rc7 > 4. Rd5 Rbb7 5. Bxf6+ Qxf6 6. Qd1 Qe6 > 7. Nd3 f6 8. Na5 Ra7 9. Qf3 > 15 36:30 1/47* 1. ... Rab8 Of course, it's wrong (as are all other move suggestions by programs other than Junior). The Rook sacrifice is the best move (unless someone has found a refutation). That's the amazing thing about the move. The above score is negative for black, and by sacrificing the rook the game was won by black.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.