Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:18:18 07/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2002 at 17:10:13, Will Singleton wrote: >On July 31, 2002 at 14:42:24, Kolss wrote: > >>On July 31, 2002 at 13:48:34, Will Singleton wrote: >> >>>Interesting, I'll have to add all that eval in the next version. ;) >>> >>>Amateur - >>>found= 6 missed= 24 seconds= 30 >>>Avg n/s= 315840 Avg depth= 11.4 >>> >>>Will >> >>What hardware did you use (Processor, HT size, possibly TB used)? That is a >>crucial piece of information that should *never* be omitted - without it solving >>times or scores on test suites are void. >>Actually this is not solely addressed to you, but to the many others who show >>good will by posting results, but forget to include these important details. >> >>Best regards, Munjong. > >amd 1.6ghz... but in positional suites, it hardly matters. > >Will I know that more time help programs to find better positional moves because after a short time they can only see a positional advantage that they do not understand and searching deeper may help them to find a position with positional advantage that they understand. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.