Author: Will Singleton
Date: 20:21:20 07/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On July 31, 2002 at 17:18:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 31, 2002 at 17:10:13, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On July 31, 2002 at 14:42:24, Kolss wrote: >> >>>On July 31, 2002 at 13:48:34, Will Singleton wrote: >>> >>>>Interesting, I'll have to add all that eval in the next version. ;) >>>> >>>>Amateur - >>>>found= 6 missed= 24 seconds= 30 >>>>Avg n/s= 315840 Avg depth= 11.4 >>>> >>>>Will >>> >>>What hardware did you use (Processor, HT size, possibly TB used)? That is a >>>crucial piece of information that should *never* be omitted - without it solving >>>times or scores on test suites are void. >>>Actually this is not solely addressed to you, but to the many others who show >>>good will by posting results, but forget to include these important details. >>> >>>Best regards, Munjong. >> >>amd 1.6ghz... but in positional suites, it hardly matters. >> >>Will > >I know that more time help programs to find better positional moves because >after a short time they can only see a positional advantage that they do not >understand and searching deeper may help them to find a position with positional >advantage that they understand. > >Uri Sure, but these positions you either get right away or not at all. See Tim's post. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.