Author: Slater Wold
Date: 07:40:19 08/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2002 at 09:27:22, stuart taylor wrote: >I'm very impressed to hear your opinions. Maybe you can pinpoint many cases to >illustrate it all. It would follow, then, that whoever had the opinion about >Hiarcs 8.0 being a "must", even if it doesn't come top, because of some great >understanding it has, would be beaten even on that count by Junior. Of course everyone has opinions on what's "the best". I was simply stating, "I think Junior is the best. If you need examples why, just ask." > In that case, if you want to see greatness, and you want one (more) program, >get Junior, and DON'T get Hiarcs? Maybe! > However, we all know that if you want results, you get Fritz. And even Tiger is >above Junior in results. > I would really be happiest if they both came together! (greatness and results) >S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.