Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:59:28 08/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2002 at 18:52:09, Slater Wold wrote: >Tested on a dual AMD 1.73Ghz. Crafty 18.15 from Hyatt's FTP. > > > >White(1): setboard r1r5/3nbpk1/4qnp1/4p1Bp/1pN1P3/1PP2Q2/4N1PP/3R1R1K b - - >Black(1): go > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 360:00 (360:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) >starting thread 1 > 5 0.12 0.91 1. ... Ra2 2. h3 Bc5 3. Nc1 Rc2 > 5 0.31 0.82 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ng3 Kg8 > 4. Kg1 > (3) 5-> 0.32 0.82 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Ng3 Kg8 > 4. Kg1 > (2) 6 0.46 0.83 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 bxc3 3. Nxc3 Nc5 4. > Bxf6+ Bxf6 5. Nd5 Bg5 > 6 0.78 0.78 1. ... Ra2 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Rc2 > 4. Kg1 Ng4 > 6-> 0.85 0.78 1. ... Ra2 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Rc2 > 4. Kg1 Ng4 > 7 1.15 0.86 1. ... Ra2 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Ra1 > 4. Nd3 Rxd1 5. Rxd1 Bc3 > 7 2.98 0.73 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Ng3 Bc5 5. Bh6 > (2) 7-> 3.23 0.73 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Rd3 Kg8 > 4. Ng3 Bc5 5. Bh6 > 8 4.35 0.74 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Bc5 > 4. Nd3 Bd4 5. Rb1 Ra2 > 8-> 5.12 0.74 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Bc5 > 4. Nd3 Bd4 5. Rb1 Ra2 > 9 7.96 0.75 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Nh7 > 4. Bh4 Kg8 5. Nd3 Be7 6. Bxe7 Qxe7 > 9-> 11.03 0.75 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Nh7 > 4. Bh4 Kg8 5. Nd3 Be7 6. Bxe7 Qxe7 > 10 20.48 0.74 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 Kg8 3. Nd2 bxc3 4. > Nxc3 Bc5 5. Nd5 Nh7 6. Bh6 Ra2 > 10-> 27.43 0.74 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 Kg8 3. Nd2 bxc3 4. > Nxc3 Bc5 5. Nd5 Nh7 6. Bh6 Ra2 > 11 44.68 0.76 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Be7 > 4. Nd3 Nh7 5. Bxe7 Qxe7 6. Qg3 h4 7. > Qf2 Kg8 > (2) 11-> 1:26 0.76 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Be7 > 4. Nd3 Nh7 5. Bxe7 Qxe7 6. Qg3 h4 7. > Qf2 Kg8 > 12 1:52 0.76 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Nh7 > 4. Bh4 Nhf6 5. Nd3 Bc3 6. Bg5 Nh7 7. > Nf4 exf4 8. Qxc3+ > (3) 12-> 3:02 0.76 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Nh7 > 4. Bh4 Nhf6 5. Nd3 Bc3 6. Bg5 Nh7 7. > Nf4 exf4 8. Qxc3+ > (2) 13 5:11 0.63 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Nh7 > 4. Bh4 Kg8 5. h3 Ndf6 6. Nd3 Bc3 7. > Rf2 Bd4 8. Nf4 > 13-> 5:51 0.63 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Nh7 > 4. Bh4 Kg8 5. h3 Ndf6 6. Nd3 Bc3 7. > Rf2 Bd4 8. Nf4 > 14 16:40 0.70 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 Nc5 3. Rd5 Nfd7 4. > cxb4 Bxg5 5. bxc5 Rxc5 6. Qd3 Rc7 7. > Qg3 Ra2 8. Qxg5 Rxe2 > 14-> 30:56 0.70 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 Nc5 3. Rd5 Nfd7 4. > cxb4 Bxg5 5. bxc5 Rxc5 6. Qd3 Rc7 7. > Qg3 Ra2 8. Qxg5 Rxe2 > 15 59:08 0.64 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 Kg8 3. Ne3 Nc5 4. > Nd5 Ncxe4 5. Nxe7+ Qxe7 6. Qxe4 Nxe4 > 7. Bxe7 bxc3 8. Rd7 Nd2 9. Rc1 Rac6 > 15-> 67:56 0.64 1. ... Ra6 2. h3 Kg8 3. Ne3 Nc5 4. > Nd5 Ncxe4 5. Nxe7+ Qxe7 6. Qxe4 Nxe4 > 7. Bxe7 bxc3 8. Rd7 Nd2 9. Rc1 Rac6 > 16 169:50 0.63 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Ra1 > 4. Nd3 Rxd1 5. Rxd1 Bc3 6. h3 Kg8 7. > Rf1 Nh7 8. Bh6 Qf6 9. Qe2 Qh4 10. Qf3 > 16-> 220:49 0.63 1. ... Ra6 2. cxb4 Bxb4 3. Nc1 Ra1 > 4. Nd3 Rxd1 5. Rxd1 Bc3 6. h3 Kg8 7. > Rf1 Nh7 8. Bh6 Qf6 9. Qe2 Qh4 10. Qf3 > time=360:00 cpu=399% mat=0 n=33382794664 fh=93% nps=1545k > ext-> chk=983771151 cap=80579769 pp=9925423 1rep=61533301 mate=587 >9294 > predicted=0 nodes=33382794664 evals=2408593287 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0 > SMP-> split=1555 stop=261 data=10/32 cpu=1439:19 elap=360:00 > >Black(1): Ra6 I suspect that no engine besides the Junior in the contest will find it without tweaking parameters off from optimium. I mean, even after a 1 week search on a stupendous machine they will not find it. I suspect (further) that even *after* Rxc4 it will take 24 hours for Crafty's score to improve to the point where the move will be understood as better than having moved Ra6 previously.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.