Author: stuart taylor
Date: 17:54:03 08/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2002 at 10:40:19, Slater Wold wrote: >On August 01, 2002 at 09:27:22, stuart taylor wrote: > >>I'm very impressed to hear your opinions. Maybe you can pinpoint many cases to >>illustrate it all. It would follow, then, that whoever had the opinion about >>Hiarcs 8.0 being a "must", even if it doesn't come top, because of some great >>understanding it has, would be beaten even on that count by Junior. > >Of course everyone has opinions on what's "the best". I was simply stating, "I >think Junior is the best. If you need examples why, just ask." I would be interested if you can explain or demonstrate a few simple things, but I wouldn't want to trouble you with too much work, as I would also trust you to an extent, if I can understand a few good indications. S.taylor > >> In that case, if you want to see greatness, and you want one (more) program, >>get Junior, and DON'T get Hiarcs? Maybe! >> However, we all know that if you want results, you get Fritz. And even Tiger is >>above Junior in results. >> I would really be happiest if they both came together! (greatness and results) >>S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.