Author: Tony Werten
Date: 12:12:49 08/03/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2002 at 15:01:03, Dave Kuntzsch wrote: >Well, I've been hanging around here for some time now and have decided to >convert and continue developing a program written in assembler many years ago >for a Z80 cpu. I'm ready to pop for a C or C++ compiler and believe either the >MS or Intel versions would probably be best. My criteria are ease of use, >efficiency of compiled code, development tools, and vendor update support. I >expect that my processor will always be Intel based, but I would like to have >the option to optimize for processor manufacturer and family. I currently have >no experience with C or C++, but do in several other languages. One other >question: Do I need a separate assembler to handle inline assembly code with >these compilers? Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks. Depends on what experience you have. Is it Pascal then easiest is to use Delphi. The difference is marginal (or non-existant) compared to C(++) Most modern compilers have a build-in assembler to handle inline asm. Tony > >Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.