Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 06:09:39 08/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2002 at 15:12:49, Tony Werten wrote: >On August 03, 2002 at 15:01:03, Dave Kuntzsch wrote: > >>Well, I've been hanging around here for some time now and have decided to >>convert and continue developing a program written in assembler many years ago >>for a Z80 cpu. I'm ready to pop for a C or C++ compiler and believe either the >>MS or Intel versions would probably be best. My criteria are ease of use, >>efficiency of compiled code, development tools, and vendor update support. I >>expect that my processor will always be Intel based, but I would like to have >>the option to optimize for processor manufacturer and family. I currently have >>no experience with C or C++, but do in several other languages. One other >>question: Do I need a separate assembler to handle inline assembly code with >>these compilers? Any thoughts are appreciated. Thanks. > >Depends on what experience you have. Is it Pascal then easiest is to use Delphi. >The difference is marginal (or non-existant) compared to C(++) > >Most modern compilers have a build-in assembler to handle inline asm. > >Tony Ho stop! I use C++ Builder, which is I think the same speed as Delphi. When I compile at MS Visual C++ my executable is typically 25-30% faster. Not exactly marginal... Bas. >> >>Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.