Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 15:12:25 08/04/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2002 at 16:59:34, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Sargon IV was a lousy mistake, an unforgivable translation from one Os to >another, a miserable badly made job plagued with bugs. So the real thing >was and is Sargon V. Sargon V is what sargon IV should be but it was not. >Fernando I preferred Sargon 3 on the Amiga. :) And it never played an illegal move, as far as I remember. I also Sargon 2 on an old Commodore machine. Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.