Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:07:16 08/05/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2002 at 12:15:32, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote: >On August 05, 2002 at 03:10:07, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>[D]8/4rk2/1p2r3/1Pp5/2Pp4/1K1P4/2PQ4/8 w - - >> >>Crafty's evalution after 14 ply +1,56. >> >>Jouni > >Crafty 18.15 static evaluation >material evaluation................. 1.60 >development......................... 0.00 >pawn evaluation..................... -0.04 >passed pawn evaluation.............. 0.00 >passed pawn race evaluation......... 0.00 >king safety evaluation.............. 0.00 >interactive piece evaluation........ -0.14 >total evaluation.................... 1.42 > > >Crafty 18.10 static evaluation >material evaluation................. 0.80 >development......................... 0.00 >pawn evaluation..................... -0.04 >passed pawn evaluation.............. 0.00 >passed pawn race evaluation......... 0.00 >king safety evaluation.............. 0.00 >interactive piece evaluation........ -0.14 >total evaluation.................... 0.62 > >Apparently Bob does believe that Q+P is much better than 2R I also decided that Q+P is better but +1.60 is too much. It seems that Crafty18.10 had a better evaluation function than Crafty18.15 I wonder what is the reason for the change. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.