Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Here's one example

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 16:07:58 08/05/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 05, 2002 at 17:50:27, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On August 05, 2002 at 12:15:32, J. Wesley Cleveland wrote:
>
>>On August 05, 2002 at 03:10:07, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>[D]8/4rk2/1p2r3/1Pp5/2Pp4/1K1P4/2PQ4/8 w - -
>>>
>>>Crafty's evalution after 14 ply +1,56.
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>Crafty 18.15 static evaluation
>>material evaluation.................   1.60
>>development.........................   0.00
>>pawn evaluation.....................  -0.04
>>passed pawn evaluation..............   0.00
>>passed pawn race evaluation.........   0.00
>>king safety evaluation..............   0.00
>>interactive piece evaluation........  -0.14
>>total evaluation....................   1.42
>>
>>
>>Crafty 18.10 static evaluation
>>material evaluation.................   0.80
>>development.........................   0.00
>>pawn evaluation.....................  -0.04
>>passed pawn evaluation..............   0.00
>>passed pawn race evaluation.........   0.00
>>king safety evaluation..............   0.00
>>interactive piece evaluation........  -0.14
>>total evaluation....................   0.62
>>
>>Apparently Bob does believe that Q+P is much better than 2R
>
>
>I believe that in most positions, unless something really unusual is
>happening, that a queen is better than two rooks, when the computer has
>the queen.  As a general rule, the queen can _always_ force a draw,
>because of the many checks it can give.  And it often finds ways to pick
>up a pawn here and there.  The exceptions occur when the rooks get doubled
>and can't be separated, but even then it is not a bad idea.
>
>I simply count a queen as equal to two rooks, period...  And in 99.9%
>of the cases, that is at least correct...  and often the queen is
>better when there is another piece on the board to help...

You do not count it as equal but as better by 0.6 pawns based on the static
evaluation.

I think that in most positions the queen is not better than
2 rooks.

Based on experience of games of movei against opponents
there were even a case when movei could draw with 2 rooks against
queen and some pawns by perpetual check.

I did not see the general rule that the queen can always draw
and I remember comp-comp games when movei with the queen lost
even against less material.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.