Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 01:39:54 08/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1998 at 03:55:16, Dusan Dobes wrote:
>On August 10, 1998 at 16:16:22, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>
>>[Event "summer-tournament"]
>>[Site "k6/200 40/120"]
>>[Date "1998.08.09"]
>>[Round "2"]
>>[White "Socrates X"]
>>[Black "Phalanx XVII"]
>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>[WhiteElo "?"]
>>[BlackElo "?"]
>>[ECO "B13"]
>>
>>1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. c3 Nf6 6. Bf4 Bg4 7. Qb3 Qc8
>>8. Nd2 e6 9. Ngf3 Be7 10. O-O O-O 11. Qc2 Bf5 12. Bxf5 exf5 13. h3 Re8
>>14. Rfe1 Ne4 15. Nf1 Qe6 16. Ne3 Rad8 17. Qb3 Rd7 18. Re2 g5 19. Bh2 g4
>>20. hxg4 fxg4 21. Ne5 Nxe5 22. dxe5 Bc5 23. Bf4 g3 24. fxg3 Qg4 25. Rae1
>>f6 26. exf6 Nxg3 27. Rf2 Qh4 28. Bxg3 Qxg3 29. Qxd5+ Rxd5 30. f7+ Kf8 31.
>>fxe8=Q+ Kxe8 32. Nxd5+ Kd8 1/2-1/2
>
>Is this all? It looks like black has very good position after move 32.
>The game should turn into an endgame with white rook, knight, and 3 pawns
>vs. black queen and 3 pawns (e.g. crafty 15.16 after 3 hours on P90:
>depth=14 -1.86 33. Re2 Qd3 34. Nf4 Qb1+ 35. Kh2 Bxf2 36. Rxf2 Qxa2).
>I think Q is stronger than R+N.
>
>Dusan Dobes
strange, my original game-score is the following:
[Event "summer-tournament"]
[Site "k6/200 40/120"]
[Date "1998.08.09"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Socrates X"]
[Black "Phalanx XVII"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[TimeControl "40/7200"]
1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. c3 Nf6 6. Bf4 Bg4 7. Qb3 Qc8
8. Nd2 e6 9. Ngf3 Be7 10. O-O O-O 11. Qc2 Bf5 12. Bxf5 exf5 13. h3 Re8 14.
Rfe1 Ne4 15. Nf1 Qe6 16. Ne3 Rad8 17. Qb3 Rd7 18. Re2 g5 19. Bh2 g4 20.
hxg4 fxg4 21. Ne5 Nxe5 22. dxe5 Bc5 23. Bf4 g3 24. fxg3 Qg4 25. Rae1 f6 26.
exf6 Nxg3 27. Rf2 Qh4 28. Bxg3 Qxg3 29. Qxd5+ Rxd5 30. f7+ Kf8 31. fxe8=Q+
Kxe8 32. Nxd5+ Kd8 33. Rf1 Qd3 34. Nf4 Bxf2+ 35. Rxf2 Qb1+ 36. Kh2 Qxa2 37.
Rd2+ Kc8 38. Kg3 Qa6 39. Kg4 Qc4 40. Kf5 Qf7+ 41. Ke5 Qg7+ 42. Kf5 Qh6 43.
g4 Qf8+ 44. Ke5 Qc5+ 45. Nd5 Kd7 46. Kf5 Kd6 47. g5 Qc8+ 48. Kf4 Qh3 49.
Nf6+ Ke6 50. Re2+ Kf7 51. Ne4 h6 52. gxh6 Kg6 53. Rf2 Qxh6+ 54. Ke5 Qg7+
55. Rf6+ Kh5 56. Kf4 Qg4+ 57. Ke5 Qe2 58. Kf4 Qf1+ 59. Ke5 Qc4 60. Kf4 Qc7+
61. Kf3 Qd8 62. Kf4 Qb8+ 63. Kf3 a6 64. Ng3+ Kh4 65. Ne4 Qh8 66. b4 Qh5+
67. Ke3 Qe8 68. Kf3 Qh8 69. c4 Qh5+ 70. Ke3 Qe8 71. Kf3 Qh8 72. c5 Qh5+ 73.
Ke3 Qe8 74. Rb6 Qf7 75. Nd6 Qe6+ 76. Kf4 Qh6+ 77. Ke4 Qh7+ 78. Kf4 Qh6+ 79.
Ke4 Qe6+ 80. Kf4 Qg4+ 81. Ke5 Qg5+ 82. Ke6 Qg4+ 83. Ke5 Qg7+ 84. Kf5 Qg5+
85. Ke6 Qg4+ 86. Ke5
{Drawn game} 1/2-1/2
For some strange reasons, my conversion of all files has cut the rest of the
game after 32 move ?!!!
I have a big pgn-file.
I imported this into rebel9 database.
I exported it from rebel-database into pgn again.
This way I can cut the move-notes(comments).
It looks rebels conversion for unknown reason has made a mistake here...
I hope this is not also in other games... :-((
I hope you are now confident with me. I played until phalanx itself gave the
above comment !!! So phalanx itself recognzed the draw.
Of course adjudication in the move 32 would have been strange... :-))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.