Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 02:32:11 08/06/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 2002 at 19:45:57, James Swafford wrote: >On August 05, 2002 at 18:01:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 05, 2002 at 17:58:16, James Swafford wrote: >> >>this is in my alltime CCC posting. >> >>If a value from +3 goes to -3 then that's the most absurd thing >>which can happen. > >Of course, if you're implying -3 means "it's good to get rid of >the bishop" or some other similar nonsense. But the point is >that moves are more important than eval term weights. > >Surely you agree... (?) You're presenting it as if they are two independent things, which is surely not true. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.