Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 03:26:02 08/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1998 at 04:39:54, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On August 11, 1998 at 03:55:16, Dusan Dobes wrote:
>
>>On August 10, 1998 at 16:16:22, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>
>>>[Event "summer-tournament"]
>>>[Site "k6/200 40/120"]
>>>[Date "1998.08.09"]
>>>[Round "2"]
>>>[White "Socrates X"]
>>>[Black "Phalanx XVII"]
>>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>>[WhiteElo "?"]
>>>[BlackElo "?"]
>>>[ECO "B13"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. c3 Nf6 6. Bf4 Bg4 7. Qb3 Qc8
>>>8. Nd2 e6 9. Ngf3 Be7 10. O-O O-O 11. Qc2 Bf5 12. Bxf5 exf5 13. h3 Re8
>>>14. Rfe1 Ne4 15. Nf1 Qe6 16. Ne3 Rad8 17. Qb3 Rd7 18. Re2 g5 19. Bh2 g4
>>>20. hxg4 fxg4 21. Ne5 Nxe5 22. dxe5 Bc5 23. Bf4 g3 24. fxg3 Qg4 25. Rae1
>>>f6 26. exf6 Nxg3 27. Rf2 Qh4 28. Bxg3 Qxg3 29. Qxd5+ Rxd5 30. f7+ Kf8 31.
>>>fxe8=Q+ Kxe8 32. Nxd5+ Kd8 1/2-1/2
>>
>>Is this all? It looks like black has very good position after move 32.
>>The game should turn into an endgame with white rook, knight, and 3 pawns
>>vs. black queen and 3 pawns (e.g. crafty 15.16 after 3 hours on P90:
>>depth=14 -1.86 33. Re2 Qd3 34. Nf4 Qb1+ 35. Kh2 Bxf2 36. Rxf2 Qxa2).
>>I think Q is stronger than R+N.
>>
>>Dusan Dobes
>
>strange, my original game-score is the following:
>
>[Event "summer-tournament"]
>[Site "k6/200 40/120"]
>[Date "1998.08.09"]
>[Round "2"]
>[White "Socrates X"]
>[Black "Phalanx XVII"]
>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>[TimeControl "40/7200"]
>
>1. e4 c6 2. d4 d5 3. exd5 cxd5 4. Bd3 Nc6 5. c3 Nf6 6. Bf4 Bg4 7. Qb3 Qc8
>8. Nd2 e6 9. Ngf3 Be7 10. O-O O-O 11. Qc2 Bf5 12. Bxf5 exf5 13. h3 Re8 14.
>Rfe1 Ne4 15. Nf1 Qe6 16. Ne3 Rad8 17. Qb3 Rd7 18. Re2 g5 19. Bh2 g4 20.
>hxg4 fxg4 21. Ne5 Nxe5 22. dxe5 Bc5 23. Bf4 g3 24. fxg3 Qg4 25. Rae1 f6 26.
>exf6 Nxg3 27. Rf2 Qh4 28. Bxg3 Qxg3 29. Qxd5+ Rxd5 30. f7+ Kf8 31. fxe8=Q+
>Kxe8 32. Nxd5+ Kd8 33. Rf1 Qd3 34. Nf4 Bxf2+ 35. Rxf2 Qb1+ 36. Kh2 Qxa2 37.
>Rd2+ Kc8 38. Kg3 Qa6 39. Kg4 Qc4 40. Kf5 Qf7+ 41. Ke5 Qg7+ 42. Kf5 Qh6 43.
>g4 Qf8+ 44. Ke5 Qc5+ 45. Nd5 Kd7 46. Kf5 Kd6 47. g5 Qc8+ 48. Kf4 Qh3 49.
>Nf6+ Ke6 50. Re2+ Kf7 51. Ne4 h6 52. gxh6 Kg6 53. Rf2 Qxh6+ 54. Ke5 Qg7+
>55. Rf6+ Kh5 56. Kf4 Qg4+ 57. Ke5 Qe2 58. Kf4 Qf1+ 59. Ke5 Qc4 60. Kf4 Qc7+
>61. Kf3 Qd8 62. Kf4 Qb8+ 63. Kf3 a6 64. Ng3+ Kh4 65. Ne4 Qh8 66. b4 Qh5+
>67. Ke3 Qe8 68. Kf3 Qh8 69. c4 Qh5+ 70. Ke3 Qe8 71. Kf3 Qh8 72. c5 Qh5+ 73.
>Ke3 Qe8 74. Rb6 Qf7 75. Nd6 Qe6+ 76. Kf4 Qh6+ 77. Ke4 Qh7+ 78. Kf4 Qh6+ 79.
>Ke4 Qe6+ 80. Kf4 Qg4+ 81. Ke5 Qg5+ 82. Ke6 Qg4+ 83. Ke5 Qg7+ 84. Kf5 Qg5+
>85. Ke6 Qg4+ 86. Ke5
>{Drawn game} 1/2-1/2
>
>For some strange reasons, my conversion of all files has cut the rest of the
>game after 32 move ?!!!
>
>I have a big pgn-file.
>I imported this into rebel9 database.
>I exported it from rebel-database into pgn again.
>This way I can cut the move-notes(comments).
>It looks rebels conversion for unknown reason has made a mistake here...
>I hope this is not also in other games... :-((
I would say this is impossible.
- Ed -
>I hope you are now confident with me. I played until phalanx itself gave the
>above comment !!! So phalanx itself recognzed the draw.
>Of course adjudication in the move 32 would have been strange... :-))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.