Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Genius remains #1 at endings? (was: Why is this position so

Author: fca

Date: 05:16:49 08/11/98

Go up one level in this thread


On August 10, 1998 at 20:48:24, Jouni Uski wrote:

>wKh2,Ba5,Ra2,Pg2,h3/bKh4,Qc8,Pg6,h5
>white to move
>solution Rc2!!
>
>In my P90 Fritz5, Rebel9, Nimzo98 and CM5000 cannot find solution in 30
>minutes, but there's exception: Mchess 7 finds it in 8'20''

On a humble Pentium 166, i.e. barely 1/2 a cpu ( :-) ), no MMX, Chess Genius 5
DOS finds Rc2 in just over 2 minutes, with an evaluation of over +3.  This is
markedly better than any other result posted here so far ...  and I did remember
to turn permanent brain off before inputting the position, as I am well aware of
CG tricks ;-)

The reason why Rc2 is hard to find is because programs are not designed for
positions considered to be freakish (basically, as Bruce has posted) by their
programmers.

How "weird" such positions actually are, however, I do not know. How can we find
out?  Maybe programmers slightly overestimate the rarity of such gems, because
their programs do not find them quickly?  Say more distant ones - where maybe
White can make a small sacrifice to reach the:
w Kh2,Ba5,Ra2,g2,h3 / b Kh4,Qc8,g6,h5
position?  Maybe cause and effect are gwtting slightly blurred here?

Kind regards

fca



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.