Author: José Carlos
Date: 08:20:38 08/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2002 at 11:14:55, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 07, 2002 at 11:04:54, José Carlos wrote: > >>On August 07, 2002 at 10:47:04, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On August 07, 2002 at 10:08:31, José Carlos wrote: >>> >>>> Also from a recent game on ICC: >>>> >>>>[D]1r1q1rk1/pbp1bp1p/1p2pnpQ/6N1/3P4/3B1N2/PPP2PPP/R4RK1 w - - 0 1 bm Ne5 >>> >>>How long does averno need to get a > 2 score on this 'easy' position? >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >> Can't check now (starting from this position) because the machine is busy >>playing other game on ICC. From my log file: >> >> Move 14 (until then, my prog expected h7h5): >> >>11 0.72 108.00 52811409 h4h6 c8b7 f3e5 d8d4 d3g6 d4e5 g6h7 g8h8 >> h7g6 h8g8 g6f7 >>11 0.72 108.00 52891267--h4h6 c8b7 f3e5 d8d4 d3g6 d4e5 g6h7 g8h8 >> h7g6 h8g8 g6f7 > > >After h4h6 c8b7 f3e5 d8d4 d3g6 d4e5 g6h7 g8h8 > h7g6 h8g8 g6f7 > > Rxf7 is forced and movei says after it Qh8+ with a small negative score. > >rook and 2 pawns against 2 bishops is not an advantage. > >Uri As I said, I can't check now because the computer is busy. My program prints the same number of moves as the nominal depth, but there can be extensions that are not printed. RPP vs BB is a small advantage, from my human point of view. There're also other things involved in eval, such as king safety that might be involved in this position. If you want, I'll post further analisys when the computer is done playing. José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.