Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 13:38:01 08/07/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2002 at 14:50:10, Rex wrote: You sound like a toddler who finds it necessary to shout for some reason. I love how your reasoning for everything you say is basically, "...and that is how it is!!" LOL... >We find the two best GM's in the world verses the top Chess Programs on the >market. This should and will be the FINAL result in determining who is >stronger, Computers or Humans. No it shouldn't. Humans get better, they come and go, new players enter the scene. Computers get better, and new engines come on the scene all the time now. There is no way this will or should be the last time these kinds of matches happen. >If the match ends equally, the win goes towards >the computer, in my mind. Why is that? Chess played perfectly is most likely a draw. If it ended even, it doesn't mean anyone is better. >These two GM's should_go_for_the_kill and NOTHING >less..... Clearly you haven't put ANY thought into anything you have said here. Kramnik and Kasparov would be absolutely foolish to "go for the kill" against tactical giants like computers. "Going for the kill" isn't always the correct plan. >I only hope the GM's win. This will give HOPE for the Chess >programers/computers to work towards in the future. IF the computer wins...Its >over!! No it isn't!! Someone forgot to take their medication this morning. Russell
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.