Author: fca
Date: 10:21:37 08/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1998 at 09:50:01, Christophe Theron wrote: >On August 10, 1998 at 22:17:30, fca wrote: > >>On August 10, 1998 at 18:33:05, Christophe Theron wrote: > >(snip) > >>>Can you say explicitely how you can be sure of these numbers, "fca"? >> >>I'm not sure, "Christophe". > >:) > >I was wondering what your real name is. I don't remember if you already >mentionned it or not, sorry. > >So may I ask you respectfully: who are you, FCA? Equally respectfully, I wonder that I do not remember now :-) I do not post here or in *that place* under any different name (which makes all the speculation pointless), and I am of course not RL (or dark side thereof!) as perhaps one might wrongly speculate that you had at one point been speculating. Just a computer chess fan, not wholly a newbie maybe. ;-) The anonymity is never abused by me. Of course you are correctly focussed on what-wrote (= post-content) rather than on red fish like who-wrote or why-wrote. :-) >>1. My source re speed of earlier CGs is exactly as reliable as Amir's. IMO, >>very reliable. >> >>2. My assumption that differences between CG3/4/5 do not produce significant nps >>differences is based on: >>(a) observation of progress through plies, etc. on known machines >>(b) rating similarities, solving times for problem sets, etc. >>(c) general folklore >> >>Kind regards >> >>fca > >Thanks for the information. > > > Christophe And you got three smileys. Invoice by email, not. Kind regards fca
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.