Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:23:22 08/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1998 at 12:03:10, blass uri wrote: >I did not criticize you. >I only said good things about the opening choice of chesstiger aha. >In the second case I talked with a friend with a power book and he said me the >probability of 3.Nc3 was 0 in his computer but he has not fritz5.03 maybe his computer is broken, or different power-books exist, or he has not loaded the power book, or maybe HE used different setting. I have no idea. I load the power-book, put setting to optimal, and thats it. If you don't have the same version of fritz, it makes not much sense to discuss this... you cannot replay chess games to prove manipulation without having the same version of the program... >and maybe the setting are a result of the games he played with fritz5. >I only posted facts. Facts are always interpreation of FACTS. Facts cannot be posted ! Facts happen. Thats all. All you say about fact is interpretation. >I posted this about the reason the probability was 0: >"He said that maybe he changed some parameters and this is the reason." I give this back to you: maybe HE changed some parameters. >If I wanted to blame you then I would not post it. ?? Sense ?! >I do not want to imply you cheat So what ?! What is the sense of your post than ?! >I did not say chrisrophe has programmed any killer line into it. >I saw tiger had an advantage after the opening so I said what I thought. >It was wise enough to choose an opening that Junior does not play usually >d4 Nf6 Bg5 so it was not prepared to play very well against it. I don't know which programs christophe has in guadelupe. But I would wonder if he would have had junior. I would estimate he has no junior. Ask him... >You may be right about Junior4.6 >I do not think Junior4.6's general positional understanding is the strong part >of it. >In most of the cases Junior is wise enough to choose an opening when >it has good positional understanding. >In this case tiger surprised it by d4 Nf6 Bg5 and it was out of book at move 4. >it expected 4.f3 >I think Junior's mistake was at move 4 >Junior5 is a better program then Junior4.6 and Junior5 plays 4...Qa5 >(4...Qa5 is the move fritz5 know as theory). I can play 10 games junior against tiger without book to prove your claim. If you can stand the result... :-)) Maybe we should ask Amir before, maybe he does not like to post the results... :-)) could be contraproductive ... >The last version of Junior5 also has a good result against fritz5.00 in the nunn >match 9.5:5.5 for Junior5 >in 30 minutes per game+30 seconds per move. very good. Junior 5 beta 16 bit has to play against DIEP 1.58.13, as you can see from the round3 pairings. Do you believe in junior ?! I would not bet... diep is strong too.. >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.