Author: blass uri
Date: 19:45:33 08/11/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 1998 at 14:23:22, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On August 11, 1998 at 12:03:10, blass uri wrote: > >>I did not criticize you. >>I only said good things about the opening choice of chesstiger > >aha. > >>In the second case I talked with a friend with a power book and he said me the >>probability of 3.Nc3 was 0 in his computer but he has not fritz5.03 > >maybe his computer is broken, or different power-books exist, or he has not >loaded the power book, or maybe HE used different setting. I have no idea. >I load the power-book, put setting to optimal, and thats it. >If you don't have the same version of fritz, it makes not much sense to discuss >this... you cannot replay chess games to prove manipulation without having the >same version of the program... > >>and maybe the setting are a result of the games he played with fritz5. >>I only posted facts. > >Facts are always interpreation of FACTS. Facts cannot be posted ! >Facts happen. Thats all. All you say about fact is interpretation. > >>I posted this about the reason the probability was 0: >>"He said that maybe he changed some parameters and this is the reason." > >I give this back to you: maybe HE changed some parameters. > >>If I wanted to blame you then I would not post it. > >?? Sense ?! > >>I do not want to imply you cheat > >So what ?! >What is the sense of your post than ?! > >>I did not say chrisrophe has programmed any killer line into it. >>I saw tiger had an advantage after the opening so I said what I thought. >>It was wise enough to choose an opening that Junior does not play usually >>d4 Nf6 Bg5 so it was not prepared to play very well against it. > >I don't know which programs christophe has in guadelupe. But I would wonder if >he would have had junior. I would estimate he has no junior. >Ask him... > >>You may be right about Junior4.6 >>I do not think Junior4.6's general positional understanding is the strong part >>of it. >>In most of the cases Junior is wise enough to choose an opening when >>it has good positional understanding. >>In this case tiger surprised it by d4 Nf6 Bg5 and it was out of book at move 4. >>it expected 4.f3 >>I think Junior's mistake was at move 4 >>Junior5 is a better program then Junior4.6 and Junior5 plays 4...Qa5 >>(4...Qa5 is the move fritz5 know as theory). > >I can play 10 games junior against tiger without book to prove your claim. >If you can stand the result... :-)) Junior4.6 is not the last version If you do it I prefer you will do it with Junior5 and chesstiger11.5 I think Junior5 as an engine for fritz is 20% slower then Amir Ban's Junior so if chesstiger wins 5.5:4.5 or 6:4 the match is not decided >Maybe we should ask Amir before, maybe he does not like to post the results... You should ask him. I think he would like to see the games if Junior5 loses because he can learn from them how to improve his program. >Junior 5 beta 16 bit has to play against DIEP 1.58.13, as you can see from the >round3 pairings. Do you believe in junior ?! I believe in Junior Uri > >I would not bet... diep is strong too.. > >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.