Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 13:49:38 08/09/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 09, 2002 at 16:28:56, John Merlino wrote: >On August 09, 2002 at 15:57:41, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>[D]2r1r1kb/5p2/p3p1pB/1p1pP1Q1/3p2P1/n1q2B2/2P2PK1/4R2R w - - 0 26 >> >>What says your program to this position ?? >> >>My full game, what I hase played today on playchess.com (my nick is "Solist"), >>see here (german text!): >> >>Chess Analysis Board: >> >>http://f50.parsimony.net/forum200775/messages/924.htm >> >>Eduard > >For the first position, Chessmaster 9000 says Mate in 7 in one second on a >PIII-600: > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -4.95 1293 26.Ra1 Nxc2 27.Rab1 d3 >0:00 1/3 -4.65 1663 26.Qd2 Nxc2 27.Qxc3 dxc3 >0:00 1/3 -4.53 2288 26.Rc1 Nxc2 27.Qf4 d3 >0:00 1/3 -4.49 2461 26.Qf4 Nxc2 27.Rb1 d3 >0:00 1/3 -4.48 3335 26.Bd1 Nxc2 27.Bxc2 Qxc2 28.Qd2 Qc3 >0:00 1/3 -0.99 6149 26.Bf8 Bxe5 27.Bxa3 Bg7 >0:00 1/4 2.55 11384 26.Bf8 Bxe5 27.Qxe5 Kxf8 28.Qf6 > Qxf3+ 29.Kxf3 Rc3+ 30.Re3 >0:01 1/5 9.13 59306 26.Bf8 Bxe5 27.Qxe5 Qxf3+ 28.Kxf3 > Rc3+ 29.Kg2 Kxf8 30.Qf6 Rh3 31.Rxh3 >0:01 1/6 Mate08 127510 26.Bf8 Qxf3+ 27.Kxf3 Rc3+ 28.Re3 > Rxe3+ 29.fxe3 Bxe5 30.Qxe5 f6 31.Rh8+ > Kxh8 32.Qxf6+ Kg8 33.Qg7# >0:01 1/7 Mate07 134484 26.Bf8 Qxf3+ 27.Kxf3 Rc3+ 28.Re3 > Rxe3+ 29.fxe3 Bxe5 30.Qxe5 Kxf8 > 31.Qf6 dxe3 32.Rh8# >0:02 1/8 Mate07 153026 26.Bf8 Qxf3+ 27.Kxf3 Rc3+ 28.Re3 > Rxe3+ 29.fxe3 Bxe5 30.Qxe5 Kxf8 > 31.Qf6 dxe3 32.Rh8# >0:02 1/9 Mate07 194621 26.Bf8 Qxf3+ 27.Kxf3 Rc3+ 28.Re3 > Rxe3+ 29.fxe3 Bxe5 30.Qxe5 Kxf8 > 31.Qf6 dxe3 32.Rh8# > >For the second position, after Qf6, it takes Chessmaster 9000, on a PIII-600, >2:27 to see that taking the queen loses. By then it's too late to see anything >better in a reasonable amount of time (if anything better even exists!): > >Time Depth Score Positions Moves >0:00 1/3 -11.45 1313 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Nxc2 28.Rb1 >0:00 1/4 -11.33 2939 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Nxc2 28.Rb1 d3 >0:00 1/5 -11.56 9663 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Nxc2 28.Rc1 d3 > 29.Bg5 d2 >0:00 1/6 -8.39 39829 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Nxc2 29.Rb1 Rc3 30.Bd2 >0:01 1/7 -7.26 91938 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Rxc2 29.Bxd5 d3 30.Bb3 d2 31.Ra1 >0:04 1/8 -4.17 317952 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Rxc2 29.Rh1 Nc4 30.Bg7 Ne3+ 31.Kg3 > Nf1+ 32.Kg2 Nh2 33.Rxh2 >0:15 1/9 -3.43 1178946 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Nxc2 29.Rh1 Ne1+ 30.Rxe1 a5 31.Be2 > b4 32.Bb5 >0:37 1/10 -3.34 2835997 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Nxc2 29.Rh1 Ne1+ 30.Rxe1 a5 31.Ra1 > a4 32.Be2 Rc5 33.Kf3 >1:05 2/11 -3.28 4887670 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Nxc2 29.Rh1 Ne1+ 30.Rxe1 b4 31.Ra1 > Rc6 32.Be2 Kh7 33.Bf4 e5 34.Rh1+ > Kg8 >2:27 3/12 2.85 11285820 26...Bxf6 27.exf6 Qxe1 28.Rxe1 > Nxc2 29.Rh1 Ne1+ 30.Rxe1 e5 31.Rh1 > Rc1 32.Rxc1 e4 33.Be2 Rb8 34.Rc7 > >jm Thank you John, strong analysis by the NEW CM 9000 !!! Best wishes, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.