Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Amateur vs Prof: Aristarch 4.4 vs Nimzo 7.32 (2)

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 02:14:37 08/10/02

Go up one level in this thread

On August 10, 2002 at 04:29:29, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 10, 2002 at 03:37:15, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>[D]1n3bk1/5p2/p1p1p1p1/Pr1bPq1p/Rp1P1P2/1P1N2P1/1R2QK1P/B7 w - - 0 37
>>Nimzo 7.32 vs Aristarch 4.4 (2)
>>P3 650/32 hash, ponder=off, 40'/40, 3-4 men TB's
>>Position after 36...h5 the beginning of Blacks counter-attack
>
>Movei suggests at depth 13
>37.Ke1 Be7 38.Kd1 Nd7 with evaluation of 1.09 pawns for white.
>
>I prefer black's position but I am not sure if white is helpless.
>
>Uri

Hi Uri
I am going to have a more deep look at this game. Analasyis to follow later.
Regards
Kurt

• Experiments seems to prove that White is lost Kurt Utzinger 08:42:08 08/10/02
  • Re: Experiments seems to prove that White is lost Uri Blass 09:26:16 08/10/02
    • Re: Experiments seems to prove that White is lost John Merlino 18:13:43 08/10/02
    • Re: Experiments seems to prove that White is lost Uri Blass 10:19:55 08/10/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.