Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:16:41 08/11/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 11, 2002 at 07:14:59, Chris Taylor wrote: > >3R4/8/8/8/2K5/6p1/3p1rk1/8 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0: > >78...d1Q 79.Rxd1 > -+ (-23.16) Depth: 8 00:00:00 74kN, tb=23 > -+ (-#22) Depth: 9 00:00:01 210kN, tb=60 >78...Rf4+ 79.Kc5 Rf5+ 80.Kb4 d1Q 81.Rxd1 > -+ (-#21) Depth: 9 00:00:02 647kN, tb=195 > -+ (-#20) Depth: 11 00:00:08 1950kN, tb=1000 >78...Kf1 79.Kc3 Ke1 80.Re8+ Re2 81.Rh8 g2 82.Rg8 d1Q 83.Kb4 Rb2+ 84.Kc5 I am interested to see your mate in 4 if white plays Rg3 or Rg4 and not 83.Kb4 Rc2+ >85.Kb6 Qb1+ 86.Ka7 Ra2# > -+ (-#19) Depth: 11 00:00:15 4708kN, tb=1967 > -+ (-#9) Depth: 15 00:07:44 227891kN, tb=43049 > >(Taylor, Notts 11.08.2002) > >Mate in 9. AMD 1700XP I do not believe that the position is mate in 9. You should not believe chess programs about the number of moves to mate because if they do not have the name chessmaster or yace or crafty they may say a number that is smaller than the real number. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.