Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The "Defense System"?

Author: Alastair Scott

Date: 12:40:40 08/11/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 11, 2002 at 14:48:34, John Merlino wrote:

>Here's something that was e-mailed to chessmaster@ubisoft.com. I suppose it will
>at least amuse some of you here, and quite possibly intrigue others.
>
>http://www.beginnersgame.com/page_21.pdf
>
>If you bother to take the time to study it closely, could you please comment on
>how useful/silly it is?

The problem is that it looks impressive but is largely information-free. If Tony
Blair were to write a chess book he'd come up with this :P

It proposes a generic, passive opening system then illustrates it with a large
number of games which are sparsely annotated only with text - no variations are
given.

This is hardly surprising given that (according to page 31) most of the games
have both sides played by nameless computer programs; no playing strengths are
stated. As far as I can tell there are no games in which both sides are human.

I'm afraid you're only going to get part of the story if computer versus
computer games are used as illustration; this is about as useful as a book with
every game 'A N Other vs A N Other'. Context is needed, and it would not
surprise me if the set of games had been chosen to show the opening in the best
possible light.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.