Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 07:07:38 08/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2002 at 07:39:29, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On August 13, 2002 at 07:21:31, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>On August 13, 2002 at 05:25:11, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Zugeordnete Felder 1.g4 - Cheron 0724 >>>[D]8/8/K6p/6p1/8/8/k5PP/8 w - - 0 1 >>> >>>Analysis by Aristarch 4.4: >>> >>>1.h4 gxh4 >>> µ (-0.92) Depth: 2/2 00:00:00 >>>1.g4 Kb3 >>> µ (-0.71) Depth: 2/2 00:00:00 >>> = (-0.23) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 >>>1.Kb5 Kb2 2.Kc5 Kc2 3.Kd5 Kd2 4.Ke5 Ke2 5.Kf6 g4 6.g3 Kf2 7.Kf5 Kg2 8.Kxg4 >>> = (-0.05) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 >>> = (0.00) Depth: 17/21 00:00:09 158kN, tb=10327 >>>1.g4 Kb2 2.Kb6 Kb3 3.Kb5 >>> = (0.21) Depth: 17/21 00:00:10 159kN, tb=10427 >>> +- (#200) Depth: 28/28 00:00:32 2185kN, tb=728484 >>> >>>(Utzinger, MyTown 13.08.2002) >> >>This means it knows it is a mate, but not in how many moves. >> >>Bas. > >Hello Bas >The faulty output might be due to the fact that Aristarch's maximal depth search >is 31 plies. I don't think so, because the table bases don't depend on this. I'd rather suspect a search artefact. This value may be a lower bound returned by the search meaning in fact "mate in ... or less moves". Uli >Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.