Author: Slater Wold
Date: 11:40:01 08/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2002 at 14:27:49, Terry McCracken wrote: >On August 13, 2002 at 14:10:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 13, 2002 at 12:36:21, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On August 13, 2002 at 12:34:09, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On August 13, 2002 at 12:00:18, Chris Carson wrote: >>>> >>>>>I do not know what HW will be used, but I am interested on opinions and guesses. >>>>> >>>>>I think each will need at least 8x1Ghz to have a chance. Is 8x1Ghz the most >>>>>likely? 4x1Ghz will be to slow, not much better (if at all) than a fast single >>>>>proc for chess programs. >>>>> >>>>>Opinions? What is the fastest HW out there for Intel or AMD? >>>>> >>>>>Chris >>>> >>>>There is no 8x1Ghz. The fastest 8-way you can get is an 8x900mhz. >>> >>>BTW - A Dell 8x900mhz computer, pretty much bare, will run you about $50k. >> >> >>Correct... And it isn't significantly faster than a quad 4x900 either. Not >>even 1.5X faster, and that doesn't count the fact that deep fritz doesn't seem >>to get particularly good speedups on multiple-cpu machines, based on the >>test results you have posted here in the past... > >http://www.chessbase.com/shop/newproducts.asp > >So how can ChessBase make this claim? How do they test? > > >"On a dual system the increase in speed is around 85% compared to a single >processor of equivalent speed." > > >Terry I have proved time and time again that this claim is false.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.