Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 11:55:39 08/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2002 at 14:40:01, Slater Wold wrote: >On August 13, 2002 at 14:27:49, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On August 13, 2002 at 14:10:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 13, 2002 at 12:36:21, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On August 13, 2002 at 12:34:09, Slater Wold wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 13, 2002 at 12:00:18, Chris Carson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I do not know what HW will be used, but I am interested on opinions and guesses. >>>>>> >>>>>>I think each will need at least 8x1Ghz to have a chance. Is 8x1Ghz the most >>>>>>likely? 4x1Ghz will be to slow, not much better (if at all) than a fast single >>>>>>proc for chess programs. >>>>>> >>>>>>Opinions? What is the fastest HW out there for Intel or AMD? >>>>>> >>>>>>Chris >>>>> >>>>>There is no 8x1Ghz. The fastest 8-way you can get is an 8x900mhz. >>>> >>>>BTW - A Dell 8x900mhz computer, pretty much bare, will run you about $50k. >>> >>> >>>Correct... And it isn't significantly faster than a quad 4x900 either. Not >>>even 1.5X faster, and that doesn't count the fact that deep fritz doesn't seem >>>to get particularly good speedups on multiple-cpu machines, based on the >>>test results you have posted here in the past... >> >>http://www.chessbase.com/shop/newproducts.asp >> >>So how can ChessBase make this claim? How do they test? >> >> >>"On a dual system the increase in speed is around 85% compared to a single >>processor of equivalent speed." >> >> >>Terry > >I have proved time and time again that this claim is false. I agree. So how do they test? Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.