Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 13:53:53 08/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2002 at 16:50:16, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On August 13, 2002 at 16:31:21, John Merlino wrote: > >>On August 13, 2002 at 15:43:36, Marc van Hal wrote: >> >>>On August 13, 2002 at 14:28:44, John Merlino wrote: >>> >>>>On August 13, 2002 at 14:21:33, John Merlino wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 13, 2002 at 10:55:44, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I saw the 3d boards on the UBIsoft.com website >>>>>>But I think there is more atention givven to the boards then to the pieces. >>>>>>Actualy on the boards I saw you could use some stained glass pieces >>>>>>or use more bumb to give more detail to wood,stone etc. >>>>>>and the saturation of the boards also can be used for the pieces >>>>>>to make them a litle bit shinny. >>>>>>Regards Marc >>>>> >>>>>Those screenshots are small, not very good and are fairly old, even though they >>>>>appear to have been posted only a few days ago. They definitely do not do the >>>>>program justice. >>>>> >>>>>Once again, the ubi.com folks are not using the stuff that we sent them. The >>>>>screenshots that I offered to send people (the same ones that we sent to >>>>>ubi.com) are MUCH nicer and show all of the boards and pieces in much better >>>>>detail. >>>>> >>>>>I have taken the liberty of sending you the screenshots that I have. I hope you >>>>>don't mind.... I think you will like them better than those that you saw on the >>>>>Ubi.com website. >>>>> >>>>>jm >>>> >>>>Unfortunately, your e-mail bounced back, either because your e-mail address that >>>>is listed here is invalid, or because your mailbox could not accept the >>>>attachment (which is a little less than 3 MB). >>>> >>>>Let me know if you want me to send you the screenshots, and how I can do so. >>>> >>>>jm >>>I can't recieve emails above 2mb >>>Marc >>>Well just a litle time and i can see the real thing. >>>But I think you agree that the 3d pieces had not as much detail as it could >>>have. >>>Most people nowadays have good Graphic cards espacialy the hard core gamers. >>>So it is kind of a bad marketing >>>You should show the program at it's best for the selling of more copy's. >>>So kind of od UBIsoft thinks diferent. >> >>There are now, unfortunately, several websites showing the poor screenshots. >>And, apparently, none of them showing the good ones. >> >>I tried removing some of the shots until the attachment was less than 2MB. It >>still bounced back. Perhaps I do not have your correct e-mail address >>(cesaer3@worldonline.nl)? >> >>However, the pieces are actually VERY detailed. The number of polys that are >>being shown with some of the piece more complex sets in the initial position is >>over 90,000. And that is without reflections or shadows, which can triple the >>poly count. >> >>jm > > >Hello John can you send me the screenshots in 2 parts, 1.4 MB today and the >remain tomorrow please ? at the following address : vincentlejeune@wanadoo.be
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.