Author: Slater Wold
Date: 16:23:08 08/13/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 13, 2002 at 19:12:55, Anson T J wrote: >========================== >Dual PIII 700 MHz @ 931MHz >256 MB Hash >Windows 2000 Professional >========================== > >[d]1k1r1b1r/p1p1q3/2p1p3/4Ppp1/4nP2/P2BQ3/1PP3PB/2KR3R b KQkq - 0 1 > >Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 931 MHz) >1...Rxh2! > µ (-1.06) Depth: 14/34 00:00:43 65328kN >1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 14/34 00:00:45 67725kN >1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:00:59 90632kN I've posted this no less than 5 times. And everyone else with a Dual AMD has posted it as well. I *KNOW* it's not strictly an AMD problem though, because I had a Dual Pentium III 1.0Ghz once upon a time, and it ran horribly on it too. This should clear up any doubt: Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 1.73 GHz) 1...Rxh2! µ (-1.06) Depth: 14/34 00:00:46 69087kN 1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 µ (-1.16) Depth: 14/34 00:00:48 71947kN 1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:06 99491kN Analysis by Deep Fritz: (1 cpu @ 1.73 GHz) 1...Rxh2! µ (-1.06) Depth: 14/36 00:00:47 68408kN 1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 µ (-1.16) Depth: 14/36 00:00:49 71401kN 1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:07 98169kN
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.