Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 cpu

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 16:23:08 08/13/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 13, 2002 at 19:12:55, Anson T J wrote:

>==========================
>Dual PIII 700 MHz @ 931MHz
>256 MB Hash
>Windows 2000 Professional
>==========================
>
>[d]1k1r1b1r/p1p1q3/2p1p3/4Ppp1/4nP2/P2BQ3/1PP3PB/2KR3R b KQkq - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 931 MHz)
>1...Rxh2!
>  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:43  65328kN
>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:45  67725kN
>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 15/34   00:00:59  90632kN

I've posted this no less than 5 times.  And everyone else with a Dual AMD has
posted it as well.  I *KNOW* it's not strictly an AMD problem though, because I
had a Dual Pentium III 1.0Ghz once upon a time, and it ran horribly on it too.

This should clear up any doubt:

Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 1.73 GHz)
1...Rxh2!
  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:46  69087kN
1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:48  71947kN
1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 15/34   00:01:06  99491kN

Analysis by Deep Fritz: (1 cpu @ 1.73 GHz)
1...Rxh2!
  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 14/36   00:00:47  68408kN
1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 14/36   00:00:49  71401kN
1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 15/34   00:01:07  98169kN



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.