Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 cpu

Author: Slater Wold

Date: 16:37:27 08/13/02

Go up one level in this thread

On August 13, 2002 at 19:32:16, Anson T J wrote:

>On August 13, 2002 at 19:23:08, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>>On August 13, 2002 at 19:12:55, Anson T J wrote:
>>
>>>==========================
>>>Dual PIII 700 MHz @ 931MHz
>>>256 MB Hash
>>>Windows 2000 Professional
>>>==========================
>>>
>>>[d]1k1r1b1r/p1p1q3/2p1p3/4Ppp1/4nP2/P2BQ3/1PP3PB/2KR3R b KQkq - 0 1
>>>
>>>Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 931 MHz)
>>>1...Rxh2!
>>>  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:43  65328kN
>>>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>>>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:45  67725kN
>>>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>>>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 15/34   00:00:59  90632kN
>>
>>I've posted this no less than 5 times.  And everyone else with a Dual AMD has
>>posted it as well.  I *KNOW* it's not strictly an AMD problem though, because I
>>had a Dual Pentium III 1.0Ghz once upon a time, and it ran horribly on it too.
>>
>>This should clear up any doubt:
>>
>>Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 1.73 GHz)
>>1...Rxh2!
>>  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:46  69087kN
>>1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 14/34   00:00:48  71947kN
>>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 15/34   00:01:06  99491kN
>>
>>Analysis by Deep Fritz: (1 cpu @ 1.73 GHz)
>>1...Rxh2!
>>  µ  (-1.06)   Depth: 14/36   00:00:47  68408kN
>>1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 14/36   00:00:49  71401kN
>>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3
>>  µ  (-1.16)   Depth: 15/34   00:01:07  98169kN
>
>I don't understand whats going on here... Thats really put me off building a
>Dual AMD... What do you think the reason is? Please try running the test again
>and setting Fritz's Priory to High. (CTRL+ALT+DELETE, Task manager, Processes
>etc)

I've done everything.  It doesn't help.

• Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 cpu Anson T J 16:57:44 08/13/02
  • Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 cpu Slater Wold 17:20:08 08/13/02
    • Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 Gian-Carlo Pascutto 03:14:10 08/14/02
      • Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 Slater Wold 05:59:42 08/14/02
        • Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 Slater Wold 06:03:17 08/14/02
  • Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 cpu Mike Byrne 17:14:15 08/13/02
    • Re: I find Deep Fritz 6 to run 1.6 times faster on 2 cpus compared to 1 cpu Slater Wold 17:19:04 08/13/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.