Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:29:40 08/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2002 at 05:21:50, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 13, 2002 at 19:23:08, Slater Wold wrote: > >>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 >> µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:06 99491kN > > >>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 >> µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:07 98169kN > >Huh? This suggest that even in NPS Deep Fritz is no faster on 2 cpus. > >That it doesn't get a good speedup I can understand, but that it >doesn't even get better NPS? > >-- >GCP I guess that slater's machine is too fast so the commercial Deep Fritz does not like it. Based on previous post the situation is better in slower machines. I do not care about it because I use only one processor. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.