Author: Slater Wold
Date: 06:02:23 08/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2002 at 09:01:22, Slater Wold wrote: >On August 14, 2002 at 05:21:50, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On August 13, 2002 at 19:23:08, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 >>> µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:06 99491kN >> >> >>>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 >>> µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:07 98169kN >> >>Huh? This suggest that even in NPS Deep Fritz is no faster on 2 cpus. >> >>That it doesn't get a good speedup I can understand, but that it >>doesn't even get better NPS? >> >>-- >>GCP > >I have *no* idea. It didn't work on my Dual P3 1.0Ghz, my AMD 1.4, 1.53, or >1.73Ghz machines. I *think* it was called, "..an AMD problem.." But I remember it not working well on my P3 either. However, other peoples P3's seem to be working well.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.