Author: Bernhard Bauer
Date: 06:38:28 08/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
Hi, you may check wether your system runs in parallel. This you could do with crafty. You have to tell Windows 2000 that you have more than 1 proc. For me it looks like you are using only 1 proc. Kind regards Bernhard On August 13, 2002 at 19:23:08, Slater Wold wrote: >On August 13, 2002 at 19:12:55, Anson T J wrote: > >>========================== >>Dual PIII 700 MHz @ 931MHz >>256 MB Hash >>Windows 2000 Professional >>========================== >> >>[d]1k1r1b1r/p1p1q3/2p1p3/4Ppp1/4nP2/P2BQ3/1PP3PB/2KR3R b KQkq - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 931 MHz) >>1...Rxh2! >> µ (-1.06) Depth: 14/34 00:00:43 65328kN >>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 >> µ (-1.16) Depth: 14/34 00:00:45 67725kN >>1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 >> µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:00:59 90632kN > >I've posted this no less than 5 times. And everyone else with a Dual AMD has >posted it as well. I *KNOW* it's not strictly an AMD problem though, because I >had a Dual Pentium III 1.0Ghz once upon a time, and it ran horribly on it too. > >This should clear up any doubt: > >Analysis by Deep Fritz: (2 cpus @ 1.73 GHz) >1...Rxh2! > µ (-1.06) Depth: 14/34 00:00:46 69087kN >1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 14/34 00:00:48 71947kN >1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:06 99491kN > >Analysis by Deep Fritz: (1 cpu @ 1.73 GHz) >1...Rxh2! > µ (-1.06) Depth: 14/36 00:00:47 68408kN >1...Rxh2! 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 14/36 00:00:49 71401kN >1...Rxh2 2.Rxh2 Qxa3 3.bxa3 Bxa3+ 4.Kb1 Nc3+ 5.Ka1 Bb2+ 6.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 7.Kb3 > µ (-1.16) Depth: 15/34 00:01:07 98169kN
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.