Author: John Merlino
Date: 12:26:43 08/14/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2002 at 01:01:57, Slater Wold wrote: >White(1): setboard 8/8/3pR1P1/2k5/8/1p1b4/7K/8 b - - 0 67 >Black(1): go >end-game phase > clearing hash tables > time surplus 0.00 time limit 3:00 (3:00) > nss depth time score variation (1) >starting thread 1 > (4) 8-> 0.39 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (3) 9 0.48 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (4) 9-> 0.73 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (3) 10 0.97 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (4) 10-> 1.67 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (3) 11 1.70 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (4) 11-> 3.55 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (3) 12 3.55 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (4) 12-> 7.45 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > (3) 13 7.53 0.01 1. ... Bxg6 2. Rxg6 <HT> > 13 21.12 ++ 1. ... b2!! > 13-> 2:49 -0.38 1. ... b26 > time=3:00 cpu=307% mat=1 n=242037717 fh=94% nps=1342k > ext-> chk=29936339 cap=78644 pp=227271 1rep=1144737 mate=32723 > predicted=0 nodes=242037717 evals=21110434 > endgame tablebase-> probes done=239240 successful=53187 > SMP-> split=778 stop=81 data=9/32 cpu=9:13 elap=3:00 > >Black(1): b2 > time used: 3:00 > >#1 - You should see b2 wins pretty much immediatly. Sure, 21.12 seconds isn't >bad, but imagine this on a PIII 600! -0.38 isn't very convincing either. > >#2 - What's up with 13-> 2:49 -0.38 1. ... b26 <//==- that? > >#3 - Any reason you can see why Crafty would take *forver* (even after this >move) to see the win? Chessmaster 9000, on a PIII-600, does not see a win until 3:24.... Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:00 1/3 -0.25 1037 67...Bf5 68.Rf6 Bc2 69.g7 0:00 1/3 -0.47 1337 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kd4 0:00 1/4 -0.30 2607 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kd4 70.Rg1 0:00 1/5 -0.30 12269 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kd4 70.Rg1 0:00 2/6 -0.30 28052 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kd4 70.Rg1 Kc3 0:01 3/7 -0.49 86892 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Rg1 d5 71.Kh3 Kc3 0:02 4/8 0.03 179397 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Kd3 71.Rh1 Bg8 72.Rd1+ Kc2 0:03 4/8 0.00 238744 67...Bc4 68.Re1 Kb4 69.g7 b2 70.Rg1 Kc3 71.Rg3+ Kc2 72.Rg2+ Kc3 73.Rg3+ 0:05 5/9 0.00 375278 67...Bc4 68.Re1 Kb4 69.g7 b2 70.Rg1 Kc3 71.Rg3+ Kc2 72.Rg2+ Kc3 73.Rg3+ 0:05 5/9 -0.34 447584 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Kc3 71.Rh1 Bg8 72.Rd1 Ba2 0:09 6/10 -0.30 746851 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Kc3 71.Kf4 Kc2 72.Re2+ Kb3 73.Re3+ Ka2 0:22 7/11 -0.31 1799613 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Kc3 71.Kf4 Kc2 72.Re2+ Kb3 73.Re1 Ka2 1:09 8/12 -0.07 5626270 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Kc3 71.Rh1 Bg8 72.Kf4 Ba2 73.Rg1 Kd3 3:24 9/13 -1.38 16983375 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Bg8 71.Kf4 Kb3 72.Kg5 Ka2 73.Kf6 b1=Q 74.Rxb1 Kxb1 15:56 10/14 -1.56 80606591 67...b2 68.g7 Bh7 69.Re1 Kc4 70.Kg3 Bg8 71.Kf4 Kb3 72.Kg5 Ka2 73.Re7 b1=Q 74.Ra7+ Kb3 75.Rb7+ Kc2 76.Rxb1 Kxb1 jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.