Author: Yuriy Lyapko
Date: 06:19:51 08/15/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2002 at 09:09:44, Dan Andersson wrote: >> >>I've never said that it is a refutation, but there is a thing I strongly >>believe: >>such short risky lines(with 3-4 pawns down by engine's point of view) should not >>be present in the book... >What a strange position to take. As long as it plays the position correctly it >should be OK. Safety first thinking is almost never acceptable when playing >chess. You have to accept some assymetries in a position to have a reasonable >chance of winning. Especially if you are the better player. > >MvH Dan Andersson But the problem is that it can't play the position correctly... On my relatively slow AMD K6-2/450 it will play 6...Kf8?? in that line even after 1 hour of thinking and will loose that position to most 300 ELO weaker engines/humans... Best regards, George
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.