Author: Mark Young
Date: 17:21:54 08/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 1998 at 16:12:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On August 12, 1998 at 14:20:31, Mark Young wrote: > >>You said Fritz 5 lost to Rebel 10 in a match. And this was proof that Fritz 5 is >>weak. The fact was Fritz drew Rebel 10 in the match and Fritz was on a slower >>computer a P 200mmx for Fritz 5 Vs A P II 400 for Rebel 10. > >When somebody tells me that he has played a match of two programs against each >other, and tells me rebel is killing fritz, I imply as a normal >thing that he uses same machines. >I have no idea which machines moritz has. He often changes his hardware. >I prefer using the same speed hardware. I see no sense in playing different >hardware. >When we telephoned this was said in a unimportant comment. We spoke about >something different, and in a small comment moritz told me this thing about >rebel10. >I did not asked him about his conditions. As i said: i think fair conditions are >the normal thing. but i see, not anybody thinks the same. >If this makes me a liar in your eyes, i accept this. >What i don't accept on the other hand is, that you call me a liar here. >Because this is IMO against the charta of this group. > I'm glad you see it my way. If you have a problem with what happend then its your own fault. You are the one that made the claim here. If you were unsure of your facts then you should have said nothing. Instead you could not wait to trash fritz one more time falsely. This is your own fault not Moritz or mine. And this time it came up and bit you in the ass. You set the standard of truth here not Moritz or I. > >> You set the >>condition of proof by saying ask Moritz. Moritz told the facts and it showed you >>are a liar. > >I don't think moritz is able to SHOW anything :-)) >He is not even able to buy 2 machines of the same speed :-)) > > >>Now what should people call you. > >mclane :-) > >> When you tell out right lies. > >I do not tell lies. > >> And >>that you know they are out right lies. > >This is not true. > >>Face it you are a liar and anything you >>say sould be taken with a heavy dose of salt. > >Again : i see your statement in contradiction to the charta of this group that >you subscribed in the same way all others did. I have send my complaints to the >moderators. > >>If I am wrong that you lied. Then have CCC delete this post for attacking you. > >The question is not if you are right or wrong. Nobody can proof this. >The main question is that you insult somebody because of hear-said ! > >>If not shut up. > >I will not shut up. It is you who is insulting me. Not vice versa. > > >>You put yourself in the situation not me. > >???? Which situation? > >>I tell CCC right now >>that if Thorsten did not lie about fritz 5. a known lie where Thorsten himself >>set the standard of proof if he was truthful or not by saying ask moritz. > >I don't understand the syntax of your sentence. I cannot understand what you >mean with this sentence above. > >> And >>Mortiz said it did not happen the way Thorsten said. > >And ?! What is the point ? > >>Then I will not call >>Thorsten a liar. > >You are not allowed to call somebody a liar anyway here ! >This is against the charta. Any insult you do is in contradiction to the charta. > > >> But just say he is bias. If I am wrong delete the post and I >>will not protest. The lie was posted by Thorsten on CCC. And responded to by >>Moritz. > > >>It was Thorsten himself how gave me the right to call him a liar by >>himself setting the conditions if what he said was true of not. > >Nobody has the right to call anybody in public a liar ! This is impolite. >Especially not to call somebody a liar when you have subscibed to the charta >of this group. >Human rights are for anybody. For criminals too. For murderer too. >Any human beeing has human rights. And it is not a question if YOU decide who to >insult and who not. > >If you insult somebody in public, you have to live with the consequences. > >It looks you WANT to provoke a reaction. >You believe you could call somebody whatever (remembers me on Rolf !:)) >just because YOU have judged that somebody is XYZ. >Thats completely intolerant. >There is no instance that judges about the ethics or the things you discuss.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.