Author: blass uri
Date: 17:55:43 08/12/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 12, 1998 at 12:32:54, Eran wrote: >On August 12, 1998 at 08:02:07, Hans Christian Lykke wrote: > >>Hej! >> >>I have started playing the Nunn-test on my P200MMX 64MB, between the >>engines Hiarsc 6 and Fritz 5.0. (both get 23MB hash) >> >>I will play it 3 times with the following levels. >> >> 67 seconds per move. >>200 seconds per move. >>600 seconds per move. >> >>How will this end up? >> >>What does all the "wise" guys on CCC think? >> >>Let´s have some predictions. >> >> >>Venlig hilsen >> >>Hans Chr. Lykke > > >The Nunn-test is wonderful, but 23MB hash is not enough if you use 67 seconds or >more per move and 200MMX. I think he have not enough RAM to use more hash. > Fritz5 fills the hash very quickly and if it is full >then the rest of the thinking time will be used very inefficiently. Therefore, >your results of the Nunn-test could be inadequate. > >Please see the hash formula on page 46 in the Fritz5 User Guide. I think the User guide warn you too much about this. I found that Fritz5 earns significantly from time when the hash tables are full. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.