Author: John Merlino
Date: 11:48:46 08/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 17, 2002 at 12:33:01, leonid wrote: >On August 17, 2002 at 11:47:45, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>On August 17, 2002 at 07:24:55, leonid wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>This position is very easy for black side and moderate for white. >>> >>>[D]B2q1q1B/b6b/QNrqkrNQ/1P1pp1P1/1nq2qn1/1n1RR1n1/4Q3/Q1Q1KQ1Q w - - >>> >>>Please indicate Your result. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Leonid. >> >>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0 on PIII-1Ghz-196HT >> >> >>; Analysis completed >> >>; 00:00:00.1 1. Score: 35,00 depth: 6 Qxg4+ >>; 00:00:01.2 1. Score: 34,10 depth: 6 Qxg4+ >>; 00:00:01.2 1. Score: 35,00 depth: 7 Qxg4+ >>; 00:00:05.7 1. Score: 44,72 depth: 7 Qxg4+ Nf5 Qxf5+ Rxf5 Nxe5+ Bg6 Qxg6+ >>Qff6 Nxc6+ Re5 Nxd8+ Qxd8 Nxc4+ >>; 00:00:14.1 1. Score: 45,62 depth: 8 Qxg4+ >>; 00:00:18.6 1. Score: 48,66 depth: 8 Qxg4+ Nf5 Qxf5+ Qxf5 Qxf5+ Rxf5 Nxe5+ >>Qff6 Nxc6+ Re5 Nxd8+ Kf5 >>; 00:01:22.9 1. Score: 49,56 depth: 9 Qxg4+ >>; 00:01:33.4 1. Score: 53,00 depth: 9 Qxg4+ Nf5 Qxf5+ Qxf5 Qxf5+ Rxf5 Nxe5+ >>Qff6 Nexc4+ Re5 Rxe5+ Kf7 Nxd6+ Rxd6 Qxa7+ >>; 00:09:26.5 1. Score: 53,90 depth: 10 Qxg4+ >>; 00:10:58.7 1. Score: Mate in 9 depth: 10 Qxg4+ Nf5 Qxf5+ Qxf5 Qxf5+ Rxf5 >>Nxe5+ Qff6 Qxf6+ Rxf6 Nxc6+ Be4 Qxf6+ Qxf6 Qc8+ >>; 00:28:19.4 1. Score: Mate in 9 depth: 11 Qxg4+ Nf5 Qxf5+ Qxf5 Qxf5+ Rxf5 >>Nxe5+ Qff6 Qxf6+ Rxf6 Nxc6+ Be4 Qxf6+ Qxf6 Qc8+ > >Is this mate in 9? > >Some programs do count moves numbers differently. > >Mine found mate in 10 for whites. > >If it is not different way of counting then I must solve once again this >position, and if result will persist, then look for bugs in my code. > >Cheers, >Leonid. > > >>; Analysis completed >> >> >>Regards, Arturo Ochoa M. Always add 1 to Tiger's mate announcements. It always declares Mate in N PLUS this move. jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.