Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 3 interviews about engine protocols with T. Mann, R. Hyatt and M. Blume

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 14:30:48 08/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 17, 2002 at 17:06:34, Will Singleton wrote:

>On August 17, 2002 at 11:14:39, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>On August 17, 2002 at 08:15:54, Andrew Williams wrote:
>>
>>>On August 17, 2002 at 05:53:55, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 17, 2002 at 00:44:48, Peter McKenzie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On August 16, 2002 at 13:20:43, Will Singleton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On August 16, 2002 at 00:58:25, Peter McKenzie wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I imagine Tiger does normal null-move pruning except near the tips where it does
>>>>>>>something more aggressive.  I agree that exactly what he is doing near the tips
>>>>>>>is indeed a "big secret".  It seems likely to me that he is doing some sort of
>>>>>>>static based (as opposed to search based) pruning based on chess specific
>>>>>>>knowledge.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sounds like the approach Don Dailey talked about a few years back.  Is that what
>>>>>>you're talking about?  Did CT mention this specifically?
>>>>>
>>>>>Don Dailey's approach is one way to do it, I'm sure there are others.  CT didn't
>>>>>mention this specificially, I'm just speculating.
>>>>>
>>>>>Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Will
>>>>
>>>>What is Don Bailey's approach?
>>>
>>>It's Don Dailey. He used to post here, and in looking for this for you I've seen
>>>LOADS of interesting posts he made. Anyhow, I *think* this is the one Pete is
>>>referring to:
>>>
>>>http://ccc.it.ro/search/ccc.php?art_id=28868
>>>
>>>However, Don had so many good ideas, this could easily be the wrong one. What a
>>>pity he no longer posts here!
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>
>>>Andrew
>>
>>Thanks for the very interesting link. I believe CT calls his forward pruning
>>technique "filter pruning". This is a name which does not seem to fit DBs idea.
>>I've come up with a very nice idea that fits this name, but I'm keeping the
>>details secret for myself!   :)
>>
>>Your tip concerning the value of Don Bailey posts seems to be good one. Thanks
>>again.
>
>No, not Don.  It's Tom.  Tom Bailey.
>
>Will

Okay, okay. I get it now. It's Don Dailey. Clever "hint" thanks.

BTW, amusingly enough I'm not the only one to make this mistake it seems:

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22don+bailey%22+chess+cilk&btnG=Google+Search



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.