Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is Deep Blue still considered better than Deep Junior ?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:34:05 08/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 18, 2002 at 09:06:02, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>   Kasparov proved that he can defeat programs at fast time controls when he
>defeated Deep Thought in a game/90 two games match in 1989. This program was
>weaker than Deep Junior is today, as it searched well over 2,000,000 NPS, but
>didn't have as much chess knowledge as Deep Junior.  He also defeated Deep Blue
>in 1996. This program is obviously much faster than Deep Junior is today, but in
>my opinion Deep Junior still has more chess knowledge than Deep Blue had back in
>1996.
>
>PS: It is hard to compare Deep Blue of 1997 vs Deep Junior of today, but in my
>opinion Deep Junior Chess Knowledge could make up for the difference of Deep
>Blue super calculating power of 1997.
>
>Pichard.

Sorry for the Empty message

Deeper blue does not exist so I see no reason to discuss about this subject.

The question has an assumption that people considered deeper blue as better than
deep Junior until today.

This assumption is not correct and people do not agree about it for a long time.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.