Author: Omid David
Date: 12:47:13 08/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2002 at 15:18:18, Russell Reagan wrote: >On August 18, 2002 at 15:02:54, Zach Wegner wrote: > >>I have heard somewhere, possibly the IBM website, i'm not too sure... that deep >>blue has retired. They said the main purpose of deep blue was to experiment with >>parallel processing, and it wasnt supposed to innovate so much in the chess >>world. >>-zach > >That's what they tell you. I think that they simply don't want to risk it losing >to newer chess engines or top GM's. If the purpose was to experiment with >parallel processing, why did they play a second match but not a third? IBM wants >you to believe that they're doing something good for all of us, but I think it's >more about "Hey look at us!!!" than it is about doing good. > >Russell As I said before, the 97 match was a poker game. IBM won by cheating, took the money, and ran away: "That's it folks, I've won. Have a nice evening!".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.