Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is Deep Blue still considered better than Deep Junior ?

Author: Chris Carson

Date: 14:57:11 08/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On August 18, 2002 at 14:50:19, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On August 18, 2002 at 12:48:02, Chris Carson wrote:
>
>>3.  There are a lot of tatical/strategic holes in DT games that modern
>>commercial programs do not make.
>
>The commercial programs may have a lot of tactical/strategical holes
>that DT didn't had. But we can't check those.
>
>>4.  Today's programs would crush DT.
>
>How can this possibly be 'an observation'. It's your personal
>opinion, not a verifyable fact.
>
>>5.  The GM's that DJ, DF, CT, Rebel, Hiarcs, The King have played recently
>>would crush DT.
>
>Same remark as last one.
>
>>6.  DT would have no chance in a match with a 2700 GM (today) that had 100
>>games of preparation, Rebel played this GM even for 4 games.
>
>And again
>
>>7.  I am pretty sure I could crush DT today.
>
>And again...sigh.
>
>--
>GCP

Yes, this is just my opinion, post I was responding to voiced an opinion and I
posted a different one.  However, DT did not score 2650 against GM's, I went
back and checked the PGN's, they were FIDE/USCF rated and many were IM's and
some FM's.

I can live with differing opinions, but saying it is just my opinion, does not
make it wrong.  :)

Chris



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.