Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 16:05:54 08/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2002 at 15:47:13, Omid David wrote: [snip[ >As I said before, the 97 match was a poker game. IBM won by cheating, took >the money, and ran away: "That's it folks, I've won. Have a nice >evening!". Cheating, huh? Care to prove it if you claim such a thing? So and so many people claiming they did cheat doesn't count as a proof though. (it more likely is people being frustrated that 'a machine beat human kind' or something like that. Anyone who thinks that this game (or the upcoming Kasparov-comp or Kramnik-comp games) have anything to do with science is a fool. Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.