Author: Uri Blass
Date: 18:55:06 08/18/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2002 at 21:21:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 18, 2002 at 16:17:34, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 18, 2002 at 11:08:37, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On August 18, 2002 at 09:06:02, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>No for many reasons >>> a) deep blue is old and how many old programs are still considered >>> 'good'? >>> >>>Even programs that reigned the world for 10 years (genius) completely >>>get butchered with x-0 scores nowadays. >> >>Genius is not losing x-0 unless x is very small. >>It is clearly weaker than the top programs of today but not so weak. >> >>Uri > >against movei perhaps. Against DIEP it's 100% simply. 20Mhz preprocessor >dedicated genius getting 7 ply with 1000 move book >against 1 million move diep book getting 10-14 ply. I thought about genius on the hardware of today otherwise it is not fair to say "Even programs that reigned the world for 10 years (genius) completely get butchered with x-0 scores nowadays." It is software+hardware and not only the software. I agree that software+hardware of 10 years ago are losing x-0 against software+hardware of today. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.