Author: Omid David
Date: 05:17:39 08/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2002 at 19:05:54, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On August 18, 2002 at 15:47:13, Omid David wrote: > >[snip[ > >>As I said before, the 97 match was a poker game. IBM won by cheating, took >>the money, and ran away: "That's it folks, I've won. Have a nice >>evening!". > >Cheating, huh? Care to prove it if you claim such a thing? So and so many people >claiming they did cheat doesn't count as a proof though. (it more likely is >people being frustrated that 'a machine beat human kind' or something like that. >Anyone who thinks that this game (or the upcoming Kasparov-comp or Kramnik-comp >games) have anything to do with science is a fool. > >Sargon When humans are accused of cheating, they take doping tests. When computers are accused of cheating, they submit full logs, something Deep Blue did partially and incompletely.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.