Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 07:09:12 08/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On August 19, 2002 at 08:17:39, Omid David wrote: >On August 18, 2002 at 19:05:54, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On August 18, 2002 at 15:47:13, Omid David wrote: >> >>[snip[ >> >>>As I said before, the 97 match was a poker game. IBM won by cheating, took >>>the money, and ran away: "That's it folks, I've won. Have a nice >>>evening!". >> >>Cheating, huh? Care to prove it if you claim such a thing? So and so many people >>claiming they did cheat doesn't count as a proof though. (it more likely is >>people being frustrated that 'a machine beat human kind' or something like that. >>Anyone who thinks that this game (or the upcoming Kasparov-comp or Kramnik-comp >>games) have anything to do with science is a fool. >> >>Sargon > >When humans are accused of cheating, they take doping tests. When computers are >accused of cheating, they submit full logs, something Deep Blue did partially >and incompletely. Did Kasparov take a doping test? Where is it? Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.